Elevate

Welcome to the Juniper Elevate Community

hero image

Featured Post

Promoted

Promo tile background

Check out the new TechPost 

Bits and Bytes Articles on Automated WAN Solutions, from Network Engineers to Network Engineers.

Browse Posts

Latest Discussions

  • Posted in: SRX

    Thank you, I'll run through this a few times on the lab units to get more familiar with the process. I think my hesitation was that I'd rather let the system handle configuration synchronization, rather than trying to do it myself, but when it comes time to do this not on the lab, peace of mind would ...

  • Posted in: SRX

    I think it's one of those "do it at your own risk" types of things. I think the main concern is the behavior of the new node1 after it's connected and boots up but before you synchronize the config. As long as you can make sure it doesn't somehow try to take over revenue traffic, you'll probably ...

  • Posted in: SRX

    Ah, so it sounds like your concern is with traffic that doesn't belong to an existing session, rather than, or in addition to, lots of sessions being initiated with incomplete handshakes. I don't have answers, unfortunately, but this is an interesting situation. My guess is that the 500,000 connections ...

  • Posted in: SRX

    I tested this on my lab units, it seems to work correctly via this shortened process after doing a 'request chassis cluster configuration-synchronize' via console on the "new" node 1 then a 'commit full' on node 0. Do you see any issues with going about it this way? It seems more simple than having ...

  • Posted in: SRX

    Okay, thank you, good to know, I guess I would have gotten bit by that, if the config wouldn't sync even with an eg request chassis cluster configuration-synchronize. I'll just follow that article closely. Regarding the features, I've got no licenses, the only thing I can think of would be the certificate ...

  • Posted in: SRX

    Dear Nikolay Semov, First of all, thank you for your response. I believe there was some confusion due to my inability to clearly convey the intended architecture. Currently, I do not own a Juniper SRX4600 device. The Juniper MX204 is performing quite well in my current setup and is meeting most of ...

  • Posted in: SRX

    Out of curiosity, what are the specific (types of) attacks that are causing your performance problems downstream? I'm just wondering if it's something that the SRX can screen out that the MX can't filter out. I'm not sure what "well-configured" means but if the SRX can't screen out the attack (i.e. ...

Latest Articles

  • Posted to: TechPost Blogs

    Migrating from a multi-area OSPF with LDP to SR-MPLS is a transition that can be achieved with ease, provided you have a clear understanding of the process and the options available. There are various ways to execute this migration, each with its own set of benefits and considerations. The approach you choose will largely depend on customer requirements, ...

  • Posted to: TechPost Blogs

    Junos 25.2R1 enhances Layer 2 Protocol Tunneling in VXLAN tunnels and traditional VLANs by introducing support for more protocols, allowing MACsec to traverse Layer 2 networks. Overview Media Access Control Security (MACsec) is primarily designed to provide point-to-point security on Ethernet links. It ensures data confidentiality and integrity ...

  • Posted to: TechPost Blogs

    Juniper BNG CUPS (Control and User Plane Separation) Architecture supports the Broadband Forum TR-459 Issue 2 and 3 use cases. This blog announces the CUPS Controller deployment options, specifically the new development for geographical redundancy. This use case improves the CUPS solution’s availability in case of data-center failures. Introduction ...

Top Contributors of the Week