Routing

Well, yes, but that seems to be corner-case IMHO. In nearly all cases you would include your lo0.0 into IGP, so that it is used to establish iBGP, RSVP, targeted LDP sessions. Unless special cases (like LDP tunneling when you 100% need to add lo0.0 ...

Hi Dmitry, You are welcome. ------------------------------ FARID AKHUNDOV ------------------------------

Just to update Farid's answer - if you are using transport-address router-id within the LDP configuration then you will probably need to include the interface where the router-id IP address is defined (most probably lo0.0) into LDP. So all in all, the ...

Thank you, Farid. I looked at other resources and was convinced once again of what you wrote. Best regards, Dmitry ------------------------------ Dmitry Maksimov ------------------------------

Well, technically, if you need to run only RSVP (or LDP), then no need to add loopback to protocols rsvp or protocols ldp hierarchy, just add it under relevant IGP. However, if the task is to implement LDP tunneling (to tunnel LDP over RSVP LSP), ...

Hi, As you mentioned, the idea is to test the bypass feature under RSVP. I already shared RSVP configuration section from the router. Interface ge-0/0/2 is the interface between PE2 and PE3, over which I am trying to build bypass to protect LSP ...

Hi, If the primary goal is to protect the path you can use the following configuration. label-switched-path pe2-pe5 { to 192.168.1.5; link-protection; primary primary1 { ### PE2-PE6-PE5 ...