Routing

Anway, this has been a great discussion and all answers are appreciated, hopefully you will be hearing from me soon for a different topic. ------------------------------ Chris Mendoza ------------------------------

Thanks Oliver. So if the policy will treat the below as an "AND" logic... community VPRN_700_Community members [ target:11.11.11.11:700 target:22.22.22.22:700 target:44.44.44.44:700 target:55.55.55.55:700 target:66.66.66.66:700 ] Then it should ...

In a policy term, when you match several community-lists , it's a logical OR between each community-list. In a policy term, when you match a community-list containing several communities, it's a logical AND inside the community-list (all the values ...

Hi Dmitriy , So I did as you suggested. I created separate community names for each community. community target:11.11.11.11:700 members target:11.11.11.11:700; community target:22.22.22.22:700 members target:22.22.22.22:700; community target:44.44.44.44:700 ...

Hello Did you ever find an answer to this issue? we have the same problem today. our temporary solution is to use QFX5120Switch stack(2) as a router/gateway for these /30 subnets. please let me know if anyone found a better solution. Regards, ...

For Item 1 As I assumed, if you use import policy in your way, the policy tries to catch routes, which have all enumerated five communities . That's why that output is empty. vMX_R3> show route table bgp.l3vpn.0 community-name VPRN_700_Community ...

Hi, For Item 2 In the Operations we are used to apply policy on both: import and export. policy-statement VPRN_700_Policy { term 1 { from community VPRN_700_Community; then accept; } ...