Routing

set policy-options community VPRN_700_Community members target:11.11.1.11:700 set policy-options community VPRN_700_Community members target:22.22.22.22:700 set policy-options community VPRN_700_Community members target:44.44.44.44:700 set policy-options ...

Hello, I could really use a fresh pair of eyes (and a few brain cycles!) to help troubleshoot a challenging issue I'm facing with LDP and Juniper MX routers in a mixed MPLS environment. Topology Overview: Core: I have an MPLS core spanning three ...

Hi You have to check "reach". "reach" indicates how many times the access was successful. 99.99.99.1's "reach" is 0 (no reach). 99.99.99.2's "reach" is 3 (this means that junos could access NTP server twice), so junos selects 99.99.99.2. ...

Storing Internet routes in a VRF has been a common practice among mobile operators since the introduction of 3G, where a clear separation of the internal IP routing context and the Internet (at the GI/SGi reference point) became a must. Having in mind ...

Hello Craig We are running our overlay network in inet.0 with separate routing instances for internet, voice, and additional services. We ran into an issue on the ACX platform, not supporting flow-monitoring for the interfaces that reside under ...

Our Internet/DFZ is in an MPLS VRF since 2011. Happy with that. Make use of the various MPLS LDPoRSVP / BGP_PIC / fast rerouting / rLFA stuff (MX routers). ------------------------------ Olivier Benghozi ------------------------------

We currently run our core routing in a separate routing instance. This is multiple transits and IXPs across 5 routers. Is there any disadvantage to using a routing instance over inet.0? Juniper's documentation and AI seem to suggest not but it is difficult ...