Routing

according to below URl, multihop BFD for static route is not supported on MX if there are more than one next hop. https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/static-routing/topics/topic-map/bfd-static-routes.html Juniper ...

at high level, ae as L2 Active Active ESI, with IRB virtual GW, with EVPN-MPLS between MX304 should work VGW and AA ESI will look as one device from SRX's view irb would be .1 as VGW address, .2 and .3 on each MX304 as unique address. but looks like ...

Interesting project, familiar remit (limited changes to surrounding devices). Maybe you should call my employer, Telent Network Services. An EVPN "collapsed core" can work just like the VC, doing both routing and switching, advantages being you now have ...

it works after changing to that regex. however, according to below URL, shouldn't ASN alone work too? https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/routing-policy/topics/concept/policy-configuring-as-path-regular-expressions-to-use-as-routing-policy-match-conditions.html ...

try updating your as-path ix to read ".* 1620 .*" <--be sure to include the quotes This will match any routes that have AS 1620 in the AS-Path. According to your policy, it will block them.

i am trying to block all routes from ASN 1620. but the routes are not learnt directly from that AS neighbor. the 'show route aspath-regex' command matches nothing, but both 'received protocol' and 'advertised protocol' commands returns routes from ASN ...

Good Day, Looking for some guidance on the best practise to transition a current campus core running as a MX VC to an EVPN collapsed spine core using MX304. Due to the simplicity in design with the current VC the L2 and L3 is simple for now, as you ...