SRX Next-Gen Firewalls

There are a couple of how-tos out there with reference to Dual ISP WAN setup, including several within the Juniper community forum. We're not load balancing our outbound traffic, but we do have dual ISP setup, so I thought I'd share what's currently ...

Thanks Marc, next-hop dl0.0 was my original configuration, so yes, I've tried that as well. I'm still not getting anything back, which is why I'm so stumped. I'm getting full on IP address on the LTE interface, so seems like all should be working ...

Thank you very much for your quick reply. I also assumed so according to the documentation, but I had to check because these two models seemed somewhat similar to me. It's much clearer to me now.

Hi, if you want to test your lte connection.. you need to change your default route.. it is now pointing to a default behind a ge interface. route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop dl0.0 should make you be able to reach 8.8.8.8. Disable or remove the default ...

SRX chassis cluster is only supported on identical model pairings. There are power architecture and internal switching differences between the srx340 and srx345. If you can't get identical models you would have to use other failover options like ...

Greetings, I have an SRX 345 unit with an LTE mini-PIM card that's connected to the cellular carrier (is configured and connected.) I've spent (too many) hours trying to get this unit to ping 8.8.8.8 via the LTE interface, but as yet, I'm just stumped ...

Hi, the customer have existing SRX340 in production, and now have intention to add SRX345 in HA mode. Is it possible? In documentation it is writen that you can put in same HA cluster only same models, but this two models are phisicalz same only performace ...