SRX

Hi all, 

is there any problem with the below setup?

run show chassis hardware detail
node0:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardware inventory:
Item Version Part number Serial number Description
Chassis XXXXXXXX SRX240H2
Routing Engine REV 14 750-043609 XXXXXX RE-SRX240H2
usb0 (addr 1) DWC OTG root hub 0 vendor 0x0000 uhub0
usb0 (addr 2) product 0x005a 90 vendor 0x0409 uhub1
usb0 (addr 3) ST72682 High Speed Mode 64218 STMicroelectronics umass0
FPC 0 FPC
PIC 0 16x GE Base PIC
FPC 1 REV 06 750-032730 XXXXXXX FPC
PIC 0 1x GE High-Perf SFP mPIM
Xcvr 0 REV 01 740-011783 XXXXXX SFP-LX10
Power Supply 0

node1:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardware inventory:
Item Version Part number Serial number Description
Chassis XXXXXXXXXX SRX240H
Routing Engine REV 45 750-021793 XXXXXXXXXX RE-SRX240H
da0 999 MB ST72682 Nand Flash
usb0 (addr 1) DWC OTG root hub 0 vendor 0x0000 uhub0
usb0 (addr 2) product 0x005a 90 vendor 0x0409 uhub1
usb0 (addr 3) ST72682 High Speed Mode 64218 STMicroelectronics umass0
FPC 0 FPC
PIC 0 16x GE Base PIC
FPC 1 REV 06 750-032730 XXXXXXXX FPC
PIC 0 1x GE High-Perf SFP mPIM
Xcvr 0 REV 01 740-011783 XXXXXXX SFP-LX10
Power Supply 0

{primary:node0}[edit]

Hi Alex,

The difference between two boxes is that SRX240h ihas 1 Gig RAM , whereas SRX240H2 has 2 gig RAM.

As it is advisable from Juniper that hardware and software should be exact to form a cluster , combination of

these two models top form a cluster may result into abnormal behaviour , so i would suggest you not to use

these two devices as a cluster.

I have seen the setup working fine for a while , however may turn out to be a issue after months.

Regards

Hemant