Routing

 View Only
last person joined: 3 days ago 

Ask questions and share experiences about ACX Series, CTP Series, MX Series, PTX Series, SSR Series, JRR Series, and all things routing, including portfolios and protocols.
  • 1.  Route Leaking between Virtual Routers

    Posted 09-13-2011 13:10

    Hi Experts

     

    VR-1 has ospf neighbour with some router say R. I exported OSPF routes from VR-2 to VR-1 but I noticed that VR-1 has now these OSPF routes from VR-2 but it is not advertising these OSPF routes to router R. I have to make a routing policy accepting these ospf routes and apply as a export to OSPF in VR-2.

     

    Could some one explain although VR-2 has OSPF exported routes from VR-2 but it is not advertising these OSPF routes further without routing policy?

     

    Thanks



  • 2.  RE: Route Leaking between Virtual Routers
    Best Answer

    Posted 09-14-2011 08:36

    Hello there,

     

    OSPF does not advertise or store routes, it advertises and stores LSAs in LSDB. Only after SPF is run, the actual routes are calculated and inserted into route table.

     

    Back to your example: VR-2 has routes injected in its route table by means of policy. That's not enough for OSPF inside VR-2, because the LSDB for OSPF process inside VR-2 does not have knowledge about these imported-from-VR-1 routes/prefixes:

    a/ these routes were not received as LSA from OSPF neighbor visible in VR-2

    b/ there were no connected OSPF-enabled interface subnets inside VR-2 which matched these routes.

    Only when you added a policy to redistribute imported-from-VR-1 routes into OSPF, only then these routes made its way into LSDB for OSPF inside VR-2.

    HTH

    Rgds

    Alex 

     



  • 3.  RE: Route Leaking between Virtual Routers

    Posted 09-14-2011 10:48

    Thanks Dear...It makes sense. Just one more thing that if I imported  any local/direct subnet from the say VR-1 to VR-2 and If try to ping that IP from VR-2, I am not able to ping unless I also imported any local/direct subnet from VR-2 to VR-1. Why thats so?



  • 4.  RE: Route Leaking between Virtual Routers

    Posted 09-14-2011 12:07

    Because if the the ping is sourced from inside VR-2 then the ping is source IP@ is one of the VR-2 local interface' IP@. 

    If you wish your ICMP Echo reply to be returned from VR-1 to VR-2, you have to make VR-2' direct routes known in VR-1.



  • 5.  RE: Route Leaking between Virtual Routers

    Posted 09-14-2011 22:26

    Thanks for the explaination