SRX Next-Gen Firewalls

 View Only
last person joined: yesterday 

Ask questions and share experiences about the SRX Series, vSRX, and cSRX.

Welcome!

If you have a question or a use case, likely there are others who are experiencing or worked through the same thing. Don't hesitate to jump in and ask or share your knowledge!

Need additional guidance?  Check out these Juniper Resources.

Juniper Threat LabsSRX Upgrade Guide Security Advisories Technical Bulletins

Latest Discussion Posts

  • Hi Victor, I changed it to " virtual-router" because this article. but you are right. It doesn't help. It's fine to use "forwarding" Juniper SRX FBF NAT issues | SRX I'm new in the community. My post was delayed because it needed to be checked ...

  • Is this procedure documented anywhere because I would've never found that but it was exactly what I required to get to where I needed to go. There wasn't a boot_unattended=0 key:value pair but I proceeded with setenv boot_unattended and it worked! So ...

  • Hello, I am new to JunOS so please bear with me. I have an environment where I have several different /24s leaving a single port on an ESXi host and connecting to a single interface on my SRX345. I added the IP's for the gates as xxx.xxx.xxx.1/24 and ...

  • Hi Everyone, I solve it by my self. The commands are changed as below set firewall family inet filter webFilter term 1 from source-address 172.16.1.12/32 set firewall family inet filter webFilter term 1 from destination-port http set firewall family ...

  • Hey folks, Running JUNOS 11.4R12, I'm attempting to use a 4GB CompactFlash card in an SRX650, while I recognise the documentation indicates a 2GB should be used, they are proving hard to source locally where I am. Following along the document here ...

  • Hi Pohui, did you tried include a new term? i mean: #Rename the term 2 to "term 100" rename firewall family inet filter webFilter term 100 to term 1 #create term 2 entry set firewall family inet filter webFilter term 2 from protocol icmp set firewall ...

  • Hi All, I would like to configure a FBF to specify a return traffic next hop in order to avoid the an asynmetric routing. The return packet from the serveur when reach the srx takes a different route (interface) instead of the interface that the ...

Unanswered Posts

Top Contributors in the Community