Junos OS

 View Only

IMPORTANT MODERATION NOTICE

This community is currently under full moderation, meaning  all posts will be reviewed before appearing in the community. Please expect a brief delay—there is no need to post multiple times. If your post is rejected, you'll receive an email outlining the reason(s). We've implemented full moderation to control spam. Thank you for your patience and participation.



  • 1.  Subscriber login fails on mpls pseudowire

    Posted 02-02-2021 11:23

    Hi,

    we're trying to connect subscribers to our working juniper BNG setup via mpls pseudowires.
    Everything is working fine until we had class-of-service shapers to limit customer downstream via radius.
    Following error occurs:

    jdhcpd: NACK received for profile request with id=0x3d57388 from bbe-smgd daemon: NACK from plugin: CoS cfg_err: 1 error_code: 1 retry FALSE result 0xfffffffd

    cosd_iffm_handler_idl: Err: Cannot locate ifl (possibly unsupported): index=129 unit=-2147483646 family=28 op=add flags=0x76561193665298434x

    relevant config parts:

    set dynamic-profiles DYNINTF-2VLANS-DHCP-INET interfaces demux0 unit "$junos-interface-unit" proxy-arp restricted

    set dynamic-profiles DYNINTF-2VLANS-DHCP-INET interfaces demux0 unit "$junos-interface-unit" vlan-tags outer "$junos-stacked-vlan-id"

    set dynamic-profiles DYNINTF-2VLANS-DHCP-INET interfaces demux0 unit "$junos-interface-unit" vlan-tags inner "$junos-vlan-id"

    set dynamic-profiles DYNINTF-2VLANS-DHCP-INET interfaces demux0 unit "$junos-interface-unit" family inet unnumbered-address lo0.0

    set dynamic-profiles DYNINTF-2VLANS-DHCP-INET interfaces demux0 unit "$junos-interface-unit" family inet unnumbered-address preferred-source-address 10.0.0.1

    set dynamic-profiles DYNINTF-2VLANS-DHCP-INET interfaces demux0 unit "$junos-interface-unit" family inet6 unnumbered-address lo0.0

    set dynamic-profiles DYNINTF-2VLANS-DHCP-INET interfaces demux0 unit "$junos-interface-unit" family inet6 unnumbered-address preferred-source-address 1234::1

    set dynamic-profiles DYNINTF-2VLANS-DHCP-INET protocols router-advertisement interface "$junos-interface-ifd-name" other-stateful-configuration

    set dynamic-profiles DYNINTF-2VLANS-DHCP-INET protocols router-advertisement interface "$junos-interface-ifd-name" prefix 1234::/64

    set dynamic-profiles DYNSUB-DHCP-VOICE-AND-INET predefined-variable-defaults cos-scheduler-shaping-rate rate 100m

    set dynamic-profiles DYNSUB-DHCP-VOICE-AND-INET predefined-variable-defaults cos-shaping-rate 1000m

    set dynamic-profiles DYNSUB-DHCP-VOICE-AND-INET predefined-variable-defaults cos-guaranteed-rate 980m

    set dynamic-profiles DYNSUB-DHCP-VOICE-AND-INET interfaces "$junos-interface-ifd-name" unit "$junos-underlying-interface-unit" family inet filter input "$junos-input-filter"

    set dynamic-profiles DYNSUB-DHCP-VOICE-AND-INET interfaces "$junos-interface-ifd-name" unit "$junos-underlying-interface-unit" family inet6 filter input "$junos-input-ipv6-filter"

    set dynamic-profiles DYNSUB-DHCP-VOICE-AND-INET class-of-service traffic-control-profiles TCP_PS shaping-rate "$junos-cos-shaping-rate"

    set dynamic-profiles DYNSUB-DHCP-VOICE-AND-INET class-of-service traffic-control-profiles TCP_PS guaranteed-rate "$junos-cos-guaranteed-rate"

    set dynamic-profiles DYNSUB-DHCP-VOICE-AND-INET class-of-service interfaces "$junos-interface-ifd-name" unit "$junos-underlying-interface-unit" output-traffic-control-profile TCP_PS

    set dynamic-profiles DYNSUB-DHCP-VOICE-AND-INET routing-options access route $junos-framed-route-ip-address-prefix next-hop "$junos-framed-route-nexthop"

    Any ideas?
    Junos: 19.4R3.11



  • 2.  RE: Subscriber login fails on mpls pseudowire

    Posted 02-01-2022 09:55
    Have you enabled hierarchical scheduling?

    E.g.:
    set interfaces lt-1/0/0 hierarchical-scheduler maximum-hierarchy-levels 2




  • 3.  RE: Subscriber login fails on mpls pseudowire

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 05-27-2022 06:03
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Was this ever resoloved?