I have the following routing tables with vr.inet.0 imported into inet.0
root@vMX-CE1# run show route
inet.0: 6 destinations, 6 routes (6 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
10.10.111.0/24 *[Direct/0] 08:52:25
> via ge-0/0/2.111
10.10.111.1/32 *[Local/0] 08:52:26
Local via ge-0/0/2.111
10.10.112.0/24 *[Direct/0] 08:52:25
> via ge-0/0/2.112
10.10.112.1/32 *[Local/0] 08:52:26
Local via ge-0/0/2.112
140.140.0.0/14 *[Direct/0] 00:16:31
> via ge-0/0/0.0
140.142.41.100/32 *[Local/0] 00:16:31
Local via ge-0/0/0.0
vr.inet.0: 2 destinations, 2 routes (2 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
140.140.0.0/14 *[Direct/0] 02:49:13
> via ge-0/0/0.0
140.142.41.100/32 *[Local/0] 02:49:13
Local via ge-0/0/0.0
I configured as follows:
root@vMX-CE1# show routing-options
rib-groups {
test {
import-rib [ inet.0 vr.inet.0 ];
}
}
set routing-instances vr routing-options interface-routes rib-group inet test
my question is
import-rib [ inet.0 vr.inet.0 ] should be this ?
or
import-rib [ vr.inet.0 inet.0] should be this ?
What is the difference ?
I can't see any difference in the routing tables.
thanks for any insight in advance !!