Im at a loss here... however, try this. This is what I have on my EX vrrp core switches.
By default, the backup VRRP router drops ARP requests for the VRRP-IP to VRRP-MAC address translation. This means that the backup router does not learn the ARP (IP-to-MAC address) mappings for the hosts sending the requests.
Passive ARP learning enables the ARP cache in the backup router to hold approximately the same contents as the ARP cache in the primary router, thus preventing the problem of learning ARP entries in a burst. To enable passive ARP learning, include the passive-learning statement at the [edit system arp] hierarchy level:
[edit system arp]
Set passive-learning
We recommend setting passive learning on both the backup and primary VRRP routers. Doing so prevents the need to manually intervene when the primary router becomes the backup router. While a router is operating as the primary router, the passive learning configuration has no operational impact. The configuration takes effect only when the router is operating as a backup router.
It would appear your configs are indeed correct.....
| Tedd Steele | SENIOR NETWORK ENGINEER CCDP, CCNP, JNCIA | | YOUR TRAVELS, OUR PLEASURE. | |
|
|
|
From: DMYTRO OSTAPENKO via Juniper Networks <Mail@community.juniper.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2025 10:33 AM
To: Tedd Steele <tsteele@iflychs.com>
Subject: RE: Switching : VRRP between 2 QFX. Couln't reach VIP from the same network.
root@IF-SW-DC-01> show lacp interfaces Aggregated interface: ae0 LACP state: Role Exp Def Dist Col Syn Aggr Timeout Activity ...
Original Message:
Sent: 3/13/2025 10:31:00 AM
From: DMYTRO OSTAPENKO
Subject: RE: VRRP between 2 QFX. Couln't reach VIP from the same network.
root@IF-SW-DC-01> show lacp interfaces
Aggregated interface: ae0
LACP state: Role Exp Def Dist Col Syn Aggr Timeout Activity
et-0/0/48 Actor No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Fast Active
et-0/0/48 Partner No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Fast Active
et-0/0/49 Actor No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Fast Active
et-0/0/49 Partner No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Fast Active
LACP protocol: Receive State Transmit State Mux State
et-0/0/48 Current Fast periodic Collecting distributing
et-0/0/49 Current Fast periodic Collecting distributing
root@IF-SW-DC-02> show lacp interfaces
Aggregated interface: ae0
LACP state: Role Exp Def Dist Col Syn Aggr Timeout Activity
et-0/0/49 Actor No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Fast Active
et-0/0/49 Partner No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Fast Active
et-0/0/48 Actor No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Fast Active
et-0/0/48 Partner No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Fast Active
LACP protocol: Receive State Transmit State Mux State
et-0/0/49 Current Fast periodic Collecting distributing
et-0/0/48 Current Fast periodic Collecting distributing
------------------------------
DMYTRO OSTAPENKO
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 03-13-2025 10:24
From: TEDD STEELE
Subject: VRRP between 2 QFX. Couln't reach VIP from the same network.
Do a show LACP interfaces
Sent on iPhone. Tedd Steele
| Tedd Steele | SENIOR NETWORK ENGINEER CCDP, CCNP, JNCIA | | YOUR TRAVELS, OUR PLEASURE. | |
|
|
|
Original Message:
Sent: 3/13/2025 9:00:00 AM
From: DMYTRO OSTAPENKO
Subject: RE: VRRP between 2 QFX. Couln't reach VIP from the same network.
Yes, links configuration on both switches is:
set interfaces et-0/0/48 ether-options 802.3ad ae0
set interfaces et-0/0/49 ether-options 802.3ad ae0
set interfaces ae0 aggregated-ether-options lacp active
set interfaces ae0 unit 0 family ethernet-switching interface-mode trunk
set interfaces ae0 unit 0 family ethernet-switching vlan members all
------------------------------
DMYTRO OSTAPENKO
Original Message:
Sent: 03-13-2025 08:54
From: TEDD STEELE
Subject: VRRP between 2 QFX. Couln't reach VIP from the same network.
We are assuming your link is like AE0 or AE1 ?
Sent on iPhone. Tedd Steele
| Tedd Steele | SENIOR NETWORK ENGINEER CCDP, CCNP, JNCIA | | YOUR TRAVELS, OUR PLEASURE. | |
|
|
|
Original Message:
Sent: 3/13/2025 8:46:00 AM
From: DMYTRO OSTAPENKO
Subject: RE: VRRP between 2 QFX. Couln't reach VIP from the same network.
I removed MC-LAG configuration for test but issue with VRRP isn't resolved.
------------------------------
DMYTRO OSTAPENKO
Original Message:
Sent: 03-13-2025 08:04
From: TEDD STEELE
Subject: VRRP between 2 QFX. Couln't reach VIP from the same network.
Mc-lag is prob the issue. Multi chassis LACP there is an issue. If you have direct connection to the the two remove mc-lag and use a standard chassis to chassis LACP config.
Since you would have 3 participating switches in a mc-lag environment there is particular vrrp config as well. That's my understanding of how vrrp is done in a multi chassis lag environment. They see each other but not across two separate links vs a direct lag across two switches. There is some setting to propagate MAC address correctly across 3 switches in mc-lag.
Sent on iPhone. Tedd Steele
| Tedd Steele | SENIOR NETWORK ENGINEER CCDP, CCNP, JNCIA | | YOUR TRAVELS, OUR PLEASURE. | |
|
|
|
Original Message:
Sent: 3/13/2025 7:57:00 AM
From: DMYTRO OSTAPENKO
Subject: RE: VRRP between 2 QFX. Couln't reach VIP from the same network.
I think it looks like a bug. I configure the same VRRP settings on EX4100 pair and it works properly. But in QFX case we have LACP aggregated link between switches (with MC-LAG settings but without configured aggregated ports across switches) and in EX is only one link between switches.
------------------------------
DMYTRO OSTAPENKO
Original Message:
Sent: 03-13-2025 07:48
From: DMYTRO OSTAPENKO
Subject: VRRP between 2 QFX. Couln't reach VIP from the same network.
In our case VLAN names are the same on both switches.
------------------------------
DMYTRO OSTAPENKO
Original Message:
Sent: 03-13-2025 07:40
From: TEDD STEELE
Subject: VRRP between 2 QFX. Couln't reach VIP from the same network.
Not necessarily true for all platforms I think but I use the same names on a vlan id #. Since you can ping .1 across other different vlans but not the 519 my guess it's the switch has a different name hence the RE confusion
Sent on iPhone. Tedd Steele
| Tedd Steele | SENIOR NETWORK ENGINEER CCDP, CCNP, JNCIA | | YOUR TRAVELS, OUR PLEASURE. | |
|
|
|
Original Message:
Sent: 3/13/2025 3:16:00 AM
From: DMYTRO OSTAPENKO
Subject: RE: VRRP between 2 QFX. Couln't reach VIP from the same network.
Yes, it's the same on both switches:
set vlans DC-D-SERVICES vlan-id 519
set vlans DC-D-SERVICES l3-interface irb.519
------------------------------
DMYTRO OSTAPENKO
Original Message:
Sent: 03-12-2025 16:57
From: TEDD STEELE
Subject: VRRP between 2 QFX. Couln't reach VIP from the same network.
Do you have under vlans section, a L3-interface irb.519 statement for that vlan ?
------------------------------
TEDD
Original Message:
Sent: 03-11-2025 10:37
From: DMYTRO OSTAPENKO
Subject: VRRP between 2 QFX. Couln't reach VIP from the same network.
I have 2 QFX switches (QFX5120-48YM-8C Junos: 20.4R1.12 flex) and try to configure VRRP.
My config:
IF-SW-DC-01
set vlans DC-D-SERVICES vlan-id 519
set vlans DC-D-SERVICES l3-interface irb.519
set interfaces irb unit 519 family inet address 10.51.8.2/24 vrrp-group 8 virtual-address 10.51.8.1
set interfaces irb unit 519 family inet address 10.51.8.2/24 vrrp-group 8 priority 200
set interfaces irb unit 519 family inet address 10.51.8.2/24 vrrp-group 8 preempt
set interfaces irb unit 519 family inet address 10.51.8.2/24 vrrp-group 8 accept-data
show vrrp
irb.519 up 8 master Active A 0.169 lcl 10.51.8.2
vip 10.51.8.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IF-SW-DC-02
set vlans DC-D-SERVICES vlan-id 519
set vlans DC-D-SERVICES l3-interface irb.519
set interfaces irb unit 519 family inet address 10.51.8.3/24 vrrp-group 8 virtual-address 10.51.8.1
set interfaces irb unit 519 family inet address 10.51.8.3/24 vrrp-group 8 priority 190
set interfaces irb unit 519 family inet address 10.51.8.3/24 vrrp-group 8 preempt
set interfaces irb unit 519 family inet address 10.51.8.3/24 vrrp-group 8 accept-data
show vrrp
irb.519 up 8 backup Active D 3.005 lcl 10.51.8.3
vip 10.51.8.1
mas 10.51.8.2
-------------------------------------------------------------
Switches connected by 2 physical links aggregated in LACP.
My problem - VIP IP 10.51.8.1 isn't reachable from the same network 10.51.8.0/24 - I try to ping it from host within this network and from backup switch:
IF-SW-DC-02> ping 10.51.8.1 source 10.51.8.3
PING 10.51.8.1 (10.51.8.1): 56 data bytes
.....
From other netwoks I can reach 10.51.8.1, 10.51.8.2 and 10.51.8.3. If I set up address 10.51.8.2 as the gateway on test host I can reach it too.
Help me to resolve the issue, please.
------------------------------
DMYTRO OSTAPENKO
------------------------------