# show chassis cluster reth-count
reth-count 22;
---
Both nodes have been updated, but the problem has not been resolved
# run show version brief
node0:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Model: srx1600
Family: junos-es
Junos: 24.2R2.18
...
node1:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Model: srx1600
Family: junos-es
Junos: 24.2R2.18
---
For clarity, I am attaching icmp-answers from the outside:
root@maya:~ # ping 19.36.52.52
PING 19.36.52.52 (19.36.52.52): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=19 ttl=62 time=1.694 ms
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=29 ttl=62 time=2.117 ms
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=34 ttl=62 time=1.636 ms
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=50 ttl=62 time=1.628 ms
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=51 ttl=62 time=1.651 ms
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=52 ttl=62 time=1.552 ms
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=54 ttl=62 time=1.717 ms
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=55 ttl=62 time=1.629 ms
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=56 ttl=62 time=1.454 ms
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=57 ttl=62 time=1.719 ms
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=58 ttl=62 time=1.532 ms
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=66 ttl=62 time=1.604 ms
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=101 ttl=62 time=1.590 ms
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=103 ttl=62 time=1.640 ms
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=104 ttl=62 time=1.581 ms
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=105 ttl=62 time=1.686 ms
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=107 ttl=62 time=1.460 ms
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=110 ttl=62 time=1.986 ms
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=111 ttl=62 time=1.574 ms
64 bytes from 19.36.52.52: icmp_seq=114 ttl=62 time=1.518 ms
^C
--- 19.36.52.52 ping statistics ---
118 packets transmitted, 20 packets received, 83.1% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.454/1.648/2.117/0.154 ms
---
With similar settings on other reth-interfaces, the loss is 0%.
------------------------------
Denis Rasskazov
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 06-15-2025 06:34
From: fb35523
Subject: SRX1600. Strange behavior of the ge- interface in the cluster
set chassis cluster reth-count 12
Perhaps that does the trick?
Oh, and do upgrade to 23.4R2-S4!
Original Message:
Sent: 06-14-2025 09:05
From: Denis Rasskazov
Subject: SRX1600. Strange behavior of the ge- interface in the cluster
Good afternoon.
Input data: SRX1600 * 2 = cluster (HA, redundancy group, etc...)
An reth#.# interface is attached to the untrust zone
A public address of the inet family has been added to the reth#.# interface.
The ping from outside is successful.
Then I combine the following ge- interfaces in reth11.44, attach them to the security zone, assign a public address, and eventually 2% of the pings reach this address.
Whatever addresses I assign, I achieve an unsuccessful result.
This only happens with interfaces: ge-0/0/11 and ge-7/0/11
Detailed data:
JUNOS 23.4R2.13
# show chassis cluster
redundancy-group 4 {
node 0 priority 100;
node 1 priority 99;
interface-monitor {
ge-0/0/11 weight 255;
ge-7/0/11 weight 255;
}
# show interfaces reth11.44
description sale_200_Mb/s;
vlan-id 44;
family inet {
address 19.36.52.52/28;
}
# show security zones security-zone sale
screen untrust-screen;
interfaces {
reth11.44 {
host-inbound-traffic {
system-services {
ping;
}
}
}
}
------------------------------
Denis Rasskazov
------------------------------