Automation

 View Only

SR-TE + PCE for autonomous traffic engineering

  • 1.  SR-TE + PCE for autonomous traffic engineering

    Posted 11 days ago

    Hello everyone,
     
    I currently work in a large ISP/backbone environment where we frequently deal with traffic engineering challenges caused by fiber cuts and capacity loss events.
     
    Today, most of our traffic engineering is still handled manually using RSVP-TE/LDP based approaches. In some scenarios, we may lose hundreds of gigabits or even multiple terabits of available capacity, requiring constant tunnel adjustments and operational intervention.
     
    Because of that, I have been studying Segment Routing (SR-MPLS) combined with centralized PCE approaches and would like to hear real-world feedback from engineers who already operate this architecture in production.
     
    Some questions I would love to hear opinions about:
     
    - How effective is SR-TE + PCE in real production environments for autonomous traffic engineering?
    - Does it significantly reduce operational complexity compared to traditional RSVP-TE?
    - How well does it behave during major backbone failures and large traffic shifts?
    - Are there any scaling or operational caveats that became apparent only after deployment?
    - Have you seen measurable improvements in convergence, capacity utilization or network stability?
    - For medium/large ISP backbones, is SR-MPLS currently the preferred migration path over traditional MPLS/LDP architectures?
     
    Our environment is multi-vendor and currently heavily MPLS/LDP based, so I'm especially interested in migration experiences and operational lessons learned.
     
    Would really appreciate insights from engineers who have deployed this at scale.
     
    Thanks!



    ------------------------------
    Guilherme Contino
    IP Network Engineer
    Link Brasil Telecomunicações
    ------------------------------