Hi,
We are trying to set up full-cone NAT on an ISP SRX5K with SPC3, specifically for STUN/P2P applications.
From our documenataion, it appears that Junos supports full-cone NAT using Persistent NAT, and also through a combination of Address Pooling Paired (APP), Endpoint-Independent Mapping (EIM), and Endpoint-Independent Filtering (EIF).
We are trying to understand whether Persistent NAT and the combination of APP + EIM + EIF serve the same purpose, or if they differ.
Also, which of the two would be the best solution in this scenario?
------------------------------
Thanks and regards
Johnson V C
Juniper networks
------------------------------