SRX Next-Gen Firewalls

 View Only

Latest Discussions

  • Reviving post! ------------------------------ Adrian Aguinaga B.S.C.M. I.T.T. Tech (Construction Management) A.A.S. I.T.T. Tech (Drafting & Design) ------------------------------

  • Reviving post! ------------------------------ Adrian Aguinaga B.S.C.M. I.T.T. Tech (Construction Management) A.A.S. I.T.T. Tech (Drafting & Design) ------------------------------

  • Your interface is configured as a Layer 3 interface type of "router on a stick" scenario. It does indeed have a VLAN tag associated on the sub-interface (unit), but it's by itself not configured as a Layer 2 interface included in a VLAN. Therefor, it ...

  • If you've double-checked you're indeed using a self-signed certificate, then the error message makes no sense -- the server certificate is also the issuer certificate. Maybe it's just a misreported error for an untrusted certificate? Have you tried adding ...

  • Hmmm ... I don't think the SRX was intended to be an NTP server. People say it works in general, but I don't think you'll find documentation for it. Besides, there are way too many variables -- your SRX1600 is not a dedicated NTP server, it's doing potentially ...

  • Just wondering if there's any official Juniper guidance on using JunOS as an NTP server for campus network environments ? I understand that NTP will need to hit the Routing Engine control plane and consume CPU cycles there in order to serve the requests, ...

  • Reviving post! ------------------------------ Adrian Aguinaga B.S.C.M. I.T.T. Tech (Construction Management) A.A.S. I.T.T. Tech (Drafting & Design) ------------------------------

Announcements

Log in to see this information

Either the content you're seeking doesn't exist or it requires proper authentication before viewing.

Unanswered Posts

  • 1 person recommends this.