Search

Discussion Post

Ipv6 interface connectivity issue

In the Routing Fundamentals lab step 2.1 it instructs to configure the ipv6 address: set ge-0/0/1 unit 0 family inet6 address fda1::1/126 set lo0/0 unit 0 family inet6 address fda9::1/128 on vSrx1 and fda1::2/126 on vSrx2 On the next step it issues a successful ping on the local interface e.g. ping fda1::1 rapid count 25 on vSrx1 I have setup the ipv6 addresses as shown in the lab. However when i issue a ping it just responds with No route to host. The ping to the lo0/0 address works fine I have issued a run show route command and have noticed that the lo0/0 address is in the routing table but instead of the ipv6 addresses configured on the interface with the /126 mask i have a link local address route in the table instead with a /128 address

Discussion Thread 5

Ipv6 interface connectivity issue

Focus Search - In the Routing Fundamentals lab step 2.1 it instructs to configure the ipv6 address: set ge-0/0/1 unit 0 family inet6 address fda1::1/126 set lo0/0 unit 0 family inet6 address fda9::1/128 on vSrx1 and fda1::2/126 on vSrx2 On the next step it issues a successful ping on the local interface e.g. ping fda1::1 rapid count 25 on vSrx1 I have setup the ipv6 addresses as shown in the lab. However when i issue a ping it just responds with No route to host. The ping to the lo0/0 address works fine I have issued a run show route command and have noticed that the lo0/0 address is in the routing table but instead of the ipv6 addresses configured on the interface with the /126 mask i have a link local address route in the table instead with a /128 address

Discussion Post

Basic IPv6 Reachability issue

My client generates these addresses: dennish@dennish-desktop:~$ ifconfig eth0 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:2f:91:6e:6b inet addr:10.50.2.50 Bcast:10.50.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fec0::ffff:211:2fff:fe91:6e6b/64 Scope:Site inet6 addr: 2001:470:d45d:dead:211:2fff:fe91:6e6b/64 Scope:Global inet6 addr: fe80::211:2fff:fe91:6e6b/64 Scope:Link Router has: root@core-router# show interfaces vlan.502 family inet ( address 10.50.2.1/24; ) family inet6 ( address 2001:470:d45d:dead::1/64; address FEC0:0:0:FFFF::1/64; ) The following config for router-advertisement has been set (timers are very low, for testing): root@core-router# show protocols router-advertisement traceoptions ( file router-advertisement; flag all; ) interface vlan.502 ( max-advertisement-interval 5; min-advertisement-interval 3; managed-configuration; other-stateful-configuration; prefix 2001:470:d45d:dead::1/64 ( on-link; autonomous; ) prefix FEC0:0:0:FFFF::/64 ( on-link; autonomous; ) ) The physical interface on which my PC is connected is simply a switchport in vlan 502and can ping the router on IPv4 and reach IPv4 internet correctly. ge-0/0/0 ( unit 0 ( family ethernet-switching ( port-mode access; vlan ( members vlan-10.50.2.0; ) ) ) ) root@core-router# show vlans vlan-10.50.2.0 ( vlan-id 502; l3-interface vlan.502; ) From my client i can't ping the 2001, nor the FEC address. From my router i can't ping my client either

Discussion Post

IPv6 on Juniper SRX240

I am trying to enable IPv6 and use my SRX240 as a router (gateway) on internal clients. I'm pretty sure I am missing something though, I added the address to the interface but trying to ping it from a client returns no results

72E1A3B2-731E-446F-9DCC-0E8A08E038D8-1-HOUTXGW_NetConfig.txt

Discussion Thread 7

MX480 - 16.3 - 6VPE IPv6 Routes Hidden

Focus Search - The route I am concerend with is 2021:........ The interface ae44 is the link from the MX to a series of QFX switched where the end CE device is located. VLAN 2300 and 2301 are the redundant paths to the end device, I cna ping both the IPv4 and v6 addresses across the links

Discussion Reply

RE: MX480 - 16.3 - 6VPE IPv6 Routes Hidden

You are corect, there are no routes in inet.3 or inet6.3...All the routes and traffic flow are correct and work (by accident, maybe) for v4 but the issue is v6 and some of that very well can be a misunderstanding

80B576EA-CFE6-4212-83E4-D131169FBF10-1-mxPeMPBGPSetup.pdf

Discussion Post

SRX IPv6 tunnel to HE.net works, but inbound requests do not

JUNOS Software Release [11.1R2.3] If I do a tcpdump on the server inside I get the following: 19:15:02.559203 IP6 2620:91:0:4205:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.40816 > 2001:470:88xx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.www: S 3498304462:3498304462(0) win 5760 <mss 1380,sackOK,timestamp 529550252 0,nop,wscale 7> 19:15:02.559222 IP6 2001:470:88xx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.www > 2620:91:0:4205:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.40816: S 3738090997:3738090997(0) ack 3498304463 win 5712 <mss 1440,sackOK,timestamp 1253197943 529550252,nop,wscale 7> 19:15:05.562793 IP6 2620:91:0:4205:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.40816 > 2001:470:88xx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.www: S 3498304462:3498304462(0) win 5760 <mss 1380,sackOK,timestamp 529550552 0,nop,wscale 7> 19:15:05.562808 IP6 2001:470:88xx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.www > 2620:91:0:4205:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.40816: S 3738090997:3738090997(0) ack 3498304463 win 5712 <mss 1440,sackOK,timestamp 1253198694 529550252,nop,wscale 7> 19:15:06.556490 IP6 2001:470:88xx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.www > 2620:91:0:4205:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.40816: S 3738090997:3738090997(0) ack 3498304463 win 5712 <mss 1440,sackOK,timestamp 1253198943 529550252,nop,wscale 7> 19:15:11.561059 IP6 2620:91:0:4205:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.40816 > 2001:470:88xx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.www: S 3498304462:3498304462(0) win 5760 <mss 1380,sackOK,timestamp 529551152 0,nop,wscale 7> 19:15:11.561076 IP6 2001:470:88xx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.www > 2620:91:0:4205:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.40816: S 3738090997:3738090997(0) ack 3498304463 win 5712 <mss 1440,sackOK,timestamp 1253200194 529550252,nop,wscale 7> 19:15:12.756489 IP6 2001:470:88xx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.www > 2620:91:0:4205:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.40816: S 3738090997:3738090997(0) ack 3498304463 win 5712 <mss 1440,sackOK,timestamp 1253200493 529550252,nop,wscale 7> 19:15:24.756489 IP6 2001:470:88xx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.www > 2620:91:0:4205:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.40816: S 3738090997:3738090997(0) ack 3498304463 win 5712 <mss 1440,sackOK,timestamp 1253203493 529550252,nop,wscale 7> And here are some snipets from my config interfaces ( ge-0/0/0 ( unit 0 ( description Cablevision; family inet ( filter ( input fix-v6v4-tunnel; ) dhcp; ) ) ) ip-0/0/0 ( unit 0 ( description "HE IPv6 Tunnel"; tunnel ( source 69.126.xxx.xxx; destination 209.51.161.14; ) family inet6 ( address 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx::2/64; ) ) ) routing-options ( rib inet6.0 ( static ( route ::/0 next-hop 2001:470:1f06:792::1; ) ) security ( forwarding-options ( family ( inet6 ( mode flow-based; ) ) ) policies ( from-zone trust to-zone untrust ( policy trust-to-untrust ( match ( source-address [ any-ipv4 any-ipv6 ]; destination-address [ any-ipv4 any-ipv6 ]; application any; ) then ( permit ( application-services ( idp; ) ) ) ) ) from-zone untrust to-zone trust ( policy allow-inbound-ipv6-http ( match ( source-address any-ipv6; destination-address SERVER-IPv6; application junos-http; ) then ( permit ( application-services ( idp; ) ) log ( session-close; ) ) ) ) ) zones ( security-zone trust ( screen untrust-screen; host-inbound-traffic ( system-services ( all; ) protocols ( all; ) ) interfaces ( vlan.0; lo0.0; ) ) security-zone untrust ( screen untrust-screen; interfaces ( ge-0/0/0.0 ( host-inbound-traffic ( system-services ( dhcp; tftp; ssh; ping; ike; ) ) ) ip-0/0/0.0 ( host-inbound-traffic ( system-services ( ssh; ) ) ) ) ) ) ) firewall ( family inet ( filter fix-v6v4-tunnel ( term one ( from ( destination-address ( 66.220.2.74/32; ) protocol 41; ) then packet-mode; ) term two ( from ( source-address ( 66.220.2.74/32; ) protocol 41; ) then packet-mode; ) term three ( then accept; ) ) ) ) #IPv6 #hosting #Server #SRX #inet6 #he.net

Discussion Post

effect of traffic-engineering bgp-igp-both-ribs on IPv6 routes

Hello, Does the command traffic-engineering bgp-igp-both-ribs have any effect on IPv6 routes iin inet6.3 table? in my lab, I have not been able to observe the replication of inet6.3 routes in inet6.0. is this expected behaviour or might I have missed something?

Discussion Thread 3

effect of traffic-engineering bgp-igp-both-ribs on IPv6 routes

Blog Entry

FAQ: SNMP Interaction with Juniper Networks Devices

Various subagents reside on different modules of Junos OS as well (such as the Routing Engine), and these subagents are managed by the snmpd...I see SNMP IPC READ ERROR messages when the SNMP process restarts on my system and also during Routing Engine switchover