Hi everybody.
Please consider the following from my book:
The last option you may use with the commit command is synchronize. When you have a
router with two Routing Engines installed, you can have the router apply the candidate configuration
to both Routing Engines.
[edit]
user@router# commit synchronize
re0: configuration check succeeds
re1: configuration check succeeds
re0: commit complete
re1: commit complete
[edit]
user@Shiraz#
This option is helpful in the event of a Routing Engine failure; the backup Routing Engine
now has the latest operational parameters in the network.
##################
Let say we have a Juniper router with two RE; RE1, RE2
RE1 is active . we configure OSPF on RE1, we commit the change without " synchronize". After a few days, RE1 crashes,
Will the new RE2 have OSPF config ? If yes, why we have not used "commit synchronize"
To put it another way:
Does using " only commit" not allow RE2 to get synch with RE1's config?
Do we have to use " commit synch " to force R2 synch with RE1's config?
Thanks and much apprecaited!!