Data Center

IMPORTANT MODERATION NOTICE

This community is currently under full moderation, meaning  all posts will be reviewed before appearing in the community. Please expect a brief delay—there is no need to post multiple times. If your post is rejected, you'll receive an email outlining the reason(s). We've implemented full moderation to control spam. Thank you for your patience and participation.



  • 1.  Juniper Doc typo ?

    Posted 21 days ago
    I came across the following:
    routing-instances evpn-mpls {
    vtep-source-interface lo0.0;
        instance-type virtual-switch;
        interface lt-1/0/10.4;
        route-distinguisher 101:2;
        vrf-target target:2:2;
        protocols {
        evpn {
            extended-vlan-list 51-52;
        }
    }
    bridge-domains {
        bd1 {
            domain-type bridge;
            vlan-id 51;
        }
        bd2 {
            domain-type bridge;
            vlan-id 52;
        }
    }
    }
    routing-instances red {
    vtep-source-interface lo0.0;
        instance-type virtual-switch;
        interface lt-1/0/10.4
        route-distinguisher 101:1;
        vrf-target target:1:1;
        protocols {
        evpn {
            encapsulation vxlan;
            extended-vni-list all;
        }
    }
    bridge-domains {
        bd1 {
            domain-type bridge;
                vlan-id 51;
                routing-interface irb.0;
                vxlan {
                vni 51;
                    encapsulate-inner-vlan;
                    decapsulate-accept-inner-vlan;
                ingress-node-replication;
            }
        }
        bd2 {
            domain-type bridge;
                vlan-id 52;
                routing-interface irb.1;
                vxlan {
                vni 52;
                    encapsulate-inner-vlan;
                    decapsulate-accept-inner-vlan;
                ingress-node-replication;
            }
        }
    }
    }​

    One of logical interface is a typo ?
    One of them should be lt-0/0/10.3,  not both are lt-0/0/10.4.  Right ?