Hi egarro,
Thank you for your response. It helped my confidence.
>request virtual-chassis vc-port delete fpc-slot 0 pic-slot 2 port 0
error: command is not valid on the ex4300-48t
Then, I tried the following format:
> request virtual-chassis vc-port delete pic-slot 2 port 0
Port deletion initiated, use cmd show virtual-chassis vc-port to verify
And observed following, but not sure about other switch of the pair:
> show interfaces terse |no-more |match "/2/"
xe-1/2/0 up down
xe-1/2/0.16386 up down
xe-1/2/1 up down
xe-1/2/1.0 up down aenet --> ae1.0
xe-1/2/2 up down
xe-1/2/3 up down
xe-1/2/3.16386 up down
Then, I tried the following format:
> request virtual-chassis vc-port delete pic-slot 2 port 0 member 0
fpc0:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Port deletion initiated, use cmd show virtual-chassis vc-port to verify
And observed following, looks like the interfaces are back:
> show interfaces terse |no-more |match "/2/"
xe-0/2/0 up down
xe-0/2/0.16386 up down
xe-0/2/1 up down
xe-0/2/1.16386 up down
xe-0/2/2 up down
xe-0/2/2.16386 up down
xe-0/2/3 up down
xe-0/2/3.16386 up down
xe-1/2/0 up down
xe-1/2/0.16386 up down
xe-1/2/1 up down
xe-1/2/1.0 up down aenet --> ae1.0
xe-1/2/2 up down
xe-1/2/3 up down
xe-1/2/3.16386 up down
I experienced a brief (e.g two minutes) interruption. Probable reason for the interruption: Two interfaces of the switches were connected to router have live similer IP netwok prepared for migration. This may have lead to IP conflict for the hosts. I'm not confident about the interruption. But I got the interfaces back.
I'd like to know if 'commit' command is necessary to make this change permanent.
I am accepting your response as solution considering your contribution.
Thanks again.
Zahid H.