Thank you spukula to spend time for us.
So, You are right, my routing is asymmetrical, so I make some modification in my configuration and now all work correctly.
That, this is for my fxp0:
routing-options {
static {
route 192.168.100.0/24 next-hop 192.168.6.1;
I will put the subnets which must access at administration interfaces (SSH and HTTPS)
}
}
and that, this is to access in a same LAN:
routing-instances {
RI-VR-LAN {
instance-type virtual-router;
interface reth0.81;
routing-options {
static {
route 192.168.100.0/24 next-hop 192.168.81.1;
I will put the subnets of my LANs
}
}
}
}
Result of show route:
netgus@EROS# run show route
inet.0: 5 destinations, 5 routes (5 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
192.168.6.0/24 *[Direct/0] 5d 00:03:18
> via fxp0.0
192.168.6.30/32 *[Local/0] 5d 00:03:18
Local via fxp0.0
192.168.100.0/24 *[Static/5] 00:22:50
> to 192.168.6.1 via fxp0.0
192.168.111.0/24 *[Direct/0] 22:40:04
> via reth1.0
192.168.111.30/32 *[Local/0] 22:40:04
Local via reth1.0
RI-VR-LAN.inet.0: 3 destinations, 3 routes (3 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
192.168.81.0/24 *[Direct/0] 00:44:12
> via reth0.81
192.168.81.254/32 *[Local/0] 00:44:12
Local via reth0.81
192.168.100.0/24 *[Static/5] 00:40:43
> to 192.168.81.1 via reth0.81
This is very different a Cisco ASA, but once you have understand how that work, that seem not very complicated (I hope so).
Again, a big thank for your help.
I will continious in my understanding of Juniper SRX.